|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, May 2, 2007
| Contact: |
Jeff
Fancher, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, 360-786-5574 |
|
Diane Oberquell,
Thurston
County
Commission Chairman, 360-786-5440 |
Thurston
County
Commissioners
Appeal
Land
Use Issues
OLYMPIA
-- Thurston
County Commissioners have decided to petition the State Supreme Court for
review of several land use issues that were recently ruled on by the State
Court of Appeals. At the same
time, they agreed to move forward with plans that may result in a phased
lifting of a moratorium on new subdivisions that has been in place for nearly
two years.
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Jeff Fancher says the
petition for review will center on three key issues-
1.
The scope of the seven-year review of county
comprehensive plan/development regulations and ten-year review of the urban
growth areas and whether parties should be able to object to parts of the plan
and regulations years after adoption.
2.
Whether designated resource lands, such as long-term
forestlands, can be included for the calculation of the county’s variety of
rural densities.
3.
Resizing of the county’s Urban Growth Areas (UGA)-
Whether the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board erred by
ignoring the presumption of validity owed to the county’s UGAs by unlawfully
imposing on the County the burden to justify the size of its urban growth
areas that were adopted many years earlier.
Fancher says these are key issues
for which the county and its citizens deserve to have some final answers.
“A ruling from the State Supreme Court will not only provide guidance
for
Thurston
County
but also for other cities and counties across the state who are facing the
same land use planning issues. Under
the decision of the Court of Appeals, locally adopted plans and regulations
will never be final and always subject to challenge.
The County is bringing forward substantial issues of public interest
that should be determined by the Supreme Court.”
Meanwhile, the county will be moving ahead with
other issues cited by the Growth Management Hearings Board in a 2005 ruling
that
Thurston
County
was out of compliance with growth management regulations.
A public
hearing will be held at 6:00pm at the
Thurston
County
Fairgrounds
Expo
Center
on Monday May 7th regarding Agricultural Lands designation and
Limited Areas of More Intensive Rural Development (Lamirds).
County
Commissioners
hope to finalize work on those two issues by May 30th.
Once that is accomplished, they may be able to lift the moratorium on
undeveloped lands within ALREADY ESTABLISHED Lamirds.
On May 29th at 5:30 at the
Worthington
Center
in Lacey, an open house will be held on the Planning Commission and staff
proposals regarding rezoning in the rural areas of
Thurston
County
. The meeting will allow
county residents a chance to give their opinions regarding various plans to
provide a variety of land use densities in the unincorporated areas.
A hearing on these proposals could be held in late June to consider
adoption. The goal is to finalize
the rural rezone work before the end of the current moratorium on July 30th.
IF the work is satisfactorily completed, Commissioners could then lift
the moratorium on new subdivisions in the RURAL part of the county.
Meanwhile, work would continue regarding the size of
the urban growth areas around the cities, pending review by both the Growth
Management Hearings Board and the State Supreme Court.
Hopefully, that part of the conflict can be resolved later this year
with assistance from the Thurston Regional Planning Council.
The moratorium could be lifted in the urban growth areas at the
conclusion of the work.
County
Commission
Chair Diane Oberquell says the end cannot come soon enough.
“Frankly I’m very frustrated that this situation has just dragged
on and has placed many people’s lives on hold.
I would like to be able to give the citizens of this county some
certainty regarding use of their property and it has been very difficult to be
caught between the Hearings Board and an environmental group that is not even
based in this county.”
|